Sunday, July 20, 2014

Steubenville East 2014



We've been doing this for over 20 years, but it never "gets old". 

It's both a joy and a privilege to be present at a Steubenville summer youth conference, and to watch the Holy Spirit transform the lives of more than 3,000 teenagers right before your eyes!

If you don't believe me, check out these videos of some of the talks and events at this year's Steubenville East Conference, which was held this past weekend at the Ryan Center, on the campus of the University of Rhode Island: Click here for videos.

Here are some pictures from the conference (click on images to enlarge):



























Sunday, July 06, 2014

The Stupidity Of Some Really Smart People



(Fourteenth Sunday of the Year (A): This homily was given on July 6, 2014 at St. Pius X Church, Westerly, R.I. by Fr. Raymond Suriani.  Read Matthew 11: 25-30.)

[For the audio version of this homily, click here: Fourteenth Sunday 2014]


“The stupidity of some really smart people.”

Because I post my homilies on my blog every week, I have to come up with a short title for each of them.

Well, believe it or not, that was the most accurate title I could come up with for today’s homily, given its subject matter.

I hope you’re not offended by the language, especially if you’re somebody who’s considered to be “smart” by your peers.

I could have entitled it, “The intellectually-challenged condition of some really smart people”—but that just didn’t have the same “ring”—or the same zing!—to it.

But please notice—the designation applies only to some smart people.  Not everyone with a high IQ is included here. 

In today’s gospel reading from Matthew 11 Jesus says, “I give praise to you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, for although you have hidden these things from the wise and the learned you have revealed them to little ones.”

Now contrary to what some people think, Jesus was NOT advocating ignorance here and telling us to be childish in our relationship with him.  Rather, he was telling us that if we want to be considered his faithful disciples we need to be childlike—which is quite different!

To be childlike before God means to be humble; it means that you know that, when all is said and done, you are totally dependent on your Father (i.e., your HEAVENLY FATHER).   To be childlike before God means that you’re in touch with—and willing to admit—your own imperfections.  It means that you know you don’t have all the answers.  But it also means that you’re TEACHABLE (in other words, that you’re open to being taught the right answers by your heavenly Father through his chosen instruments here on earth).

Now the good news is that there are many very smart people in our world today who DO embody this kind of childlikeness in their lives.  Some of them, I believe, are members of this parish.  These intelligent, devout men and women have many spiritual ancestors: people like St. Paul; St. Thomas Aquinas (who was arguably the greatest theologian of all time); St. Teresa of Avila; St. Edith Stein (who was a brilliant philosopher); St. John Paul II—and on and on the list goes.

But there many others out there who think that they know more than God (and certainly more than the Church!)—and this leads them, unfortunately, to advocate and support certain foundational ideas that, quite frankly, are really stupid!

Let me give you a list of them.  (This, by the way, is only a partial list—to give an exhaustive one would require hours.)  I entitle it, “Some of the most noteworthy stupid ideas of some really smart people in 2014.”

Because some people will do the wrong thing, we have to give everyone the tools and the help they need to do the wrong thing.

That’s the stupid idea that stands behind, among other things, the “safe-sex education” that many of your children and grandchildren receive in school (yes, even here in wonderful Westerly!).  But not at St. Pius X School!  We teach our young people the truth in an age-appropriate way.

Yet another reason to send your children there!

Because some people will do the wrong thing, we have to legalize the wrong thing so that people can do the wrong thing “safely.”  

This is the stupid idea that drives the smart people who want to legalize things like recreational drugs and prostitution—as it drove some smart (and evil) people 40 years ago in their efforts to legalize abortion.

Human life begins whenever we say it begins.  

The science of genetics has proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that a new and separate human life is present at the moment of conception—and up until a few years ago all the medical literature reflected that truth.  But then certain smart people wanted to be able to say that the birth control pill can never, ever function as an abortifacient (which it CAN in certain circumstances!); and so, without any scientific evidence whatsoever, they simply changed the definition of pregnancy!  Now we’re told that pregnancy begins at implantation and not at conception.  Thus, during the time between conception and implantation (according to these smart men and women), you can do whatever you want to do to that new human life in the womb!

How convenient!  How clever!  

And how stupid.

Directly killing an innocent human being can be an act of compassion and love.  

A lot of smart people are acting on this stupid idea these days by removing food and hydration from terminally ill patients long before their bodies have begun “shut down.”  This is one reason why you should all make plans to be here on Tuesday, October 14, when Fr. Tad Pacholczyk will be with us to talk about “end of life issues.”  

(The announcement is in the bulletin.)

For the sake of your sick and elderly loved ones you need to be here for that presentation.

A choice can be considered good without any reference whatsoever to the “object” of the choice.  

Many of our brilliant politicians who proudly call themselves “pro-choice” believe that idea—which is, without question, one of the stupidest ideas of all!

Even most five-year-olds know that one of the ways that you evaluate a particular choice is by looking at its “object”: It’s a good choice if the “object” of the choice is good; it’s a bad choice if the “object” of the choice is bad.

Perhaps we should seriously consider electing some kindergarteners to Congress later this year!  They’d probably do a better job than the people who are there right now.

They certainly couldn’t do much worse!

Marriage is whatever you say it is—unless you say that it’s exclusively between one man and one woman.  In that case, marriage is NOT what you say it is!  

Now it would be nice if you could reason with a smart person who embraced this particular stupid idea by saying to that person, “But marriage has never involved two people of the same gender.  Since the beginning of human history marriage has always involved a man and a woman, because only a man and a woman have the natural potential to beget children.”  

But that type of reasoning won’t work with them, because another stupid idea that these smart people believe (and this is the last one I’ll mention today) is that they are smarter than everyone else who’s come before them!

So it doesn’t matter what intelligent men and women have believed in the past.  It doesn’t matter what the ancient philosophers and moralists and civil leaders thought—it doesn’t even matter what people in the last century thought and did.

These smart people of 2014 say, “We are the truly enlightened ones.  We know better than all the men and women of the past put together, so we can disregard everything that they’ve said—if we choose to.”

“I give praise to you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, for although you have hidden these things from the wise and the learned you have revealed them to little ones.”

Let me conclude now on a slightly more positive note.  We need to remember that the same Jesus who said these words to us this morning also said, “Seek, and you shall find.”  This means that there’s always hope—even for very, very smart people who believe very, very stupid ideas.  If they begin to seek the truth sincerely and humbly, they can ALWAYS find it.

Like St. Augustine did.  Augustine, as many of us know, was a brilliant young intellectual of the 4th century who embraced some incredibly dumb ideas—mostly because he wanted to justify his immoral lifestyle.

And in the process he drove his saintly mother crazy!

BUT HE CHANGED!

And when he changed, his stupid ideas left him, never to return.

Let us pray at this Mass that God will give us many more “St. Augustines” in our world today.

Sunday, June 29, 2014

Why The Church Is Better Than Facebook



(Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul 2008: This homily was given on June 29, 2014 at St. Pius X Church, Westerly, R.I., by Fr. Raymond Suriani.  Read 2 Timothy 4: 6-8, 17-18; Matthew 16: 13-19.)

[For the audio version of this homily, click here: Peter and Paul 2014]



The title of my homily today is, “Why the Church is better than Facebook.”

Let me begin by making it clear that I have nothing, per se, against Facebook and people who are on it.  I’m not on Facebook, personally, mostly because of time constraints.  I have enough to keep me occupied, technologically speaking, with my blog and email and text messaging.

Any more than that would result in what you might call “technological overdose,” which I definitely don’t need.

That having been said, why do I say that the Church is better than Facebook?

Well it’s because of an article someone sent me the other day by a man named John Horvat II.  The article was entitled, “Unfriending Facebook.”

When I read the title, the first thought that occurred to me was, “This must be about Facebook users who’ve dropped the service for various reasons.”

But I was wrong.

The article was actually about Facebook employees who have left the company because of the way it’s run.  And the irony is that “the way it’s run” is precisely what attracted many of them to the company in the first place!

You see, Facebook is an organization that, as Horvatt puts it, “breaks all the rules, smashes traditional hierarchies and lets its employees exercise their creativity without all the restrictions of times past.”

The rules and policies, in other words (like set hours and clear job descriptions), that guide most employees in most places of employment do not apply, for the most part, to the men and women who work at Facebook.

Now you would think that this would be something they all loved, but in many cases it’s precisely what has driven them away from the company.

In addressing the question of what former Facebook employees complain about, Mr. Horvatt writes the following:

Curiously, [they complain mostly about] those “fun” things that are heralded as cutting edge in the new postmodern workplace: the lack of organization, focus and rules.

Working for Facebook can be exhausting since this is not your normal 9-to-5 job that plays by the old rules. Everything goes. Employees can be subjected to long 12-14 hour workdays under stressful conditions. Engineers complained of being on call 24/7 for weeks at a time to keep service up and running. Employees are absorbed by the fast pace and intensity of their work.

The no-walls free-flow atmosphere that is supposed to foster creativity is also stressful to workers who complain of a complete lack of privacy whatsoever at the social media giant.

“At most companies, you put up a wall between a work personality and a personal one, which ends up with a professional workspace,” wrote one former employee. “This wall does not exist at Facebook which can lead to some uncomfortable situations.”

Yet another popular complaint was the laid-back attitude that left everything undefined and unfocused. Employees sensed a lack of infrastructure to provide guidance or support. There are constant guessing games where workers are expected to intuit what is happening in their departments and what is expected of them. The result is a “lack of professionalism” and “stability” where instructions are not clear and organization is lacking, which leads, in turn to stressful situations.

This leads Mr. Horvatt to draw the following conclusions:

These and other complaints underscore the importance of human relationships and leadership in the workplace. It is not surprising that, despite high wages, perks and the prestige of being part of an over-hyped company, there are those who opt out of working in a pressure cooker. People are not made to live in an atmosphere where a reckless spirit of unrestraint and instant gratification dominates. They need guidance, infrastructure and leadership to give them support. As a result, frenetic intemperance takes its toll upon the psyche causing burnout and disillusionment.


Facebook needs to face the fact that life is not a Facebook page consisting of superficial posts of fun and games. Until the social media giant learns this important lesson, it can expect to see itself increasingly “unliked” and “unfriended” by its disillusioned employees.

So why is the Church better than Facebook?

Well, ironically enough, the Church is better precisely for the reason that some people complain about her!  To use the terms found in this article, it’s because the Church has a clear organization—and a clear focus—and defined rules (which we call “commandments”).  It’s because the Church gives us guidance and support.  It’s because the Church preaches against unrestraint and instant gratification, and because the Church clearly teaches us what God expects of us, and what we need to do to get on—and to stay on—the road to heaven!

So often those outside the Church—and sometimes even certain people INSIDE the Church—criticize her for these very things.  But, as the experience of many former Facebook employees makes clear, we need guidelines and rules and structures in order to be happy and to reach our full potential as human beings!

This is why Jesus gave us a hierarchical Church and instituted the papacy.  Jesus created us; he knows how we operate and he knows what we need.  Jesus called himself “the Truth” in John 14, and in John 8 he promised that his truth—his teaching—would set his followers “free”: free from sin; free from Satan; free from eternal death; free from fear and hopelessness.

But Jesus was not na├»ve!  He knew that his truth needed a guardian: a chief guardian who would work in conjunction with other guardians to preserve and teach and defend his truth from the time he ascended into heaven until the end of the world.

Without such an authority Jesus knew his people would very quickly and very easily fall into error and become divided from one another (which is precisely what has happened, historically, in Protestantism).

And so, one day during his ministry—when he was with his apostles at Caesarea Philippi—Jesus singled out one man to be that first guardian—that first spiritual father—for his future spiritual family: “You are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it.”

Now some of our non-Catholic brothers and sisters will object to this idea and say, “No, no—Jesus wasn’t establishing the papacy here.  He wasn’t establishing an office.  Yes, he was making Peter the head of the apostles, but Peter’s authority ended when he died.  There’s no provision for his authority to be passed on to anyone else.”

Oh yes there is!  Here’s where “the keys” come into the picture.  Jesus said to Peter, “I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven.  Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”

The symbolism of “the keys” goes back to the 22nd chapter of the book of the prophet Isaiah.  There a man named Shebna (who was something like the Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Judah at the time) is removed from office and replaced by a man named Eliakim. 

And to indicate the change in power God says these words:  “I will place the key of the House of David on [Eliakim’s] shoulder; what he opens, no one will shut, what he shuts, no one will open.”

The “key” there in that verse symbolizes dynastic authority—that is to say, the authority of an office: an authority that was meant to be passed on from one person to another.

Jesus, therefore, gave Peter “the keys” to make it clear to him (and to all of us) that he was establishing something PERMANENT: an office that would continue to exist long, long after Peter died.

And it has—Pope Francis being the 265th man after St. Peter to occupy the office of spiritual father (i.e., pope) in the Lord’s spiritual family, the Church.

Some people (especially in the secular media) are waiting for Pope Francis to change the teaching of the Church on certain matters of faith and morals.

We all know what those issues are; no need to list them here.

Well, they’ll be waiting for a long time, because it isn’t going to happen!

Yes, he may change certain disciplines and policies in the Church; he may change certain aspects of the bureaucratic structure of the Church; he may focus on certain aspects of Church teaching that previous popes haven’t emphasized as much.

True enough.  But he will NOT change the defined teachings of the Catechism—because he can’t!  He can only guard and protect and teach those things.

That’s all he has the power to do!

Notice that St. Paul says in today’s second reading, “I have kept THE FAITH.”  It wasn’t his own opinions that he was faithful to; it wasn’t his own version of Christianity that he followed.  He kept THE FAITH—THE ONE TRUE FAITH, of which St. Peter was the chief guardian.

You see, unlike the officials at Facebook, the Church doesn’t leave her people without direction and guidance and the help and assistance they need.

That’s why we have a Pope; and that’s one of the biggest reasons why the Church is—and always will be—better than Facebook.

Sunday, June 22, 2014

Eucharistic Miracles And Their Purpose




The Eucharistic Miracles of Lanciano (top) and Santarem.

(Corpus Christi 2014 (A): This homily was given on June 22, 2014 at St. Pius X Church, Westerly, R.I. by Fr. Raymond Suriani.  Read 1 Corinthians 11: 17-34; John 6: 51-58.)

[For the audio version of this homily, click here: Corpus Christi 2014]


I have been blessed to see two Eucharistic miracles in my life.  I saw the first one eleven years ago in the Church of St. Stephen, in Santarem, Portugal.
 
The story of that particular miracle, which some of you have probably heard before, involves events that go back to the mid-13th century. A woman who lived in Santarem at the time was greatly troubled by her husband’s adulterous behavior—as she should have been!  Unfortunately, however, she made the mistake of going to the local sorceress—the local witch—to find a solution to her problem.  The witch promised the woman that her husband would change his ways and become faithful to her again—if the woman obtained for the witch a consecrated host from the local church.  (In case you’re not aware of it, certain people involved in the occult—especially those in satanic cults—love to get hold of consecrated hosts in order to desecrate them.) 

So the woman pretended to be ill and went to see the local priest at St. Stephen’s, asking him for prayers and for Holy Communion.  The priest innocently gave her the Eucharist, which the woman took out of her mouth (obviously when the priest wasn’t looking) and put into the veil she was wearing on her head.  But she never made it to the witch’s house.  As the woman left the church, the host began to bleed!  She panicked (which is quite understandable!), ran home with the bleeding host, and put it into the cedar trunk where she kept her clean linens.  During the night, however, the woman and her husband were awakened by bright rays of light coming from the trunk.  At that point, she confessed to her husband what she had done.  Not surprisingly, both were converted on the spot!  The two spent the entire night in adoration of the Blessed Sacrament.  Some neighbors also saw the light that evening, and they began coming to the house the next day.  Finally the parish priest was told.  He took the Eucharistic miracle back to the Church of St. Stephen, where it’s been ever since—and where I saw it in 2003.

The other miracle, which I have preached about on several occasions in the past—and which is one of the most extraordinary Eucharistic miracles of all—I finally got to see in person on our recent pilgrimage to Italy.
 
I’m talking about the Eucharistic Miracle of Lanciano.  It happened back in the 8th century, when a priest of Lanciano was having doubts about the Real Presence of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist.  Not surprisingly, he prayed to have those doubts removed.  Well one day, as he was celebrating Mass, God answered his request in miraculous fashion by literally changing the bread and wine into flesh and blood at the consecration.  The elements were never consumed; they’ve been preserved for 13 centuries at a shrine in Lanciano.  In 1971, the Church decided to have the elements analyzed by a team of scientists.  Their testing led them to the following conclusions:

  1. The blood of the Eucharistic Miracle is real blood and the flesh is real flesh.  Both belong to the human species.
  2. The flesh consists of the muscular tissue of the heart.
  3. The flesh and blood have the same blood type (AB positive).
  4. The proteins in the blood are in the same proportions as those found in normal, fresh human blood.
  5. There is no trace whatsoever of any materials or agents having been used to preserve the elements.
This is probably the most famous of all the miracles that have occurred since Jesus instituted the sacrament of the Eucharist at the Last Supper.

Now you may be surprised to learn that one of the lesser known Eucharistic miracles took place just a couple of decades ago—in the 1990s—and it involved our present Holy Father, Pope Francis, when he was a bishop in Buenos Aires.

I read about this one just the other day.

Here’s how writer Alicia Colon described the miracle in an article she wrote last year for The American Thinker web site:

On August 18, 1996 in Buenos Aires, Argentina, at Holy mass, a woman discovered a discarded host on a candleholder and brought it to Fr. Alejandro Pezet who placed it in a container of water inside the tabernacle of the chapel of the Blessed Sacrament. The following Monday, August 26, upon opening the tabernacle, the priest was astonished to find that the Host had become a bloody substance and he notified his Bishop Jorge Bergoglio [now Pope Francis], who gave instructions that the bloodied flesh be photographed. When the photographs were taken on September 6, the bloodied flesh had grown significantly in size. After it had been kept in the tabernacle for a few years the Bishop decided to have it scientifically analyzed since it had not suffered any visible decomposition. …

In 1999, in the presence of then Cardinal Bergoglio, Dr. Ricardo Castanon, an atheist at the time, sent the fragment to New York for analysis, but did not inform the team of scientists its origin so as not to prejudice the study.  One scientist, Dr. Frederic Zugiba, a cardiologist and forensic pathologist, determined that the substance was real flesh and contained human DNA, and furthermore he concluded was a piece of heart muscle. …

Here is some of his testimony:

“The analyzed material is a fragment of the heart muscle found in the wall of the left ventricle close to the valves. This muscle is responsible for the contraction of the heart. It should be borne in mind that the left cardiac ventricle pumps blood to all parts of the body. The heart muscle is in an inflammatory condition and contains a large number of white blood cells. This indicates that the heart was alive at the time the sample was taken. It is my contention that the heart was alive, since white blood cells die outside a living organism. They require a living organism to sustain them. . . . What is more, these white blood cells had penetrated the tissue, which further indicates that the heart had been under severe stress, as if the owner had been beaten severely about the chest.”

Oh yes, one more interesting fact about the flesh in Buenos Aires: DNA tests revealed an exact match with the flesh at Lanciano, along with the same blood type (AB positive)—which indicates that the two pieces of flesh came from the very same person, even though the miracles that produced them were separated by more than a thousand years!

Why am I not surprised?

I tell you these three stories today because it’s very easy for all of us (including us priests!) to lose our awareness of the miracle that happens at every Mass!  Because the Mass is such an ordinary part of our lives as Catholics, the constant temptation is for us to begin to look at the Eucharist as something “ordinary.”

And it’s not!

In fact, I believe that’s why the Lord has given us these special Eucharistic miracles over the years: to make clear to us that the Eucharist is anything but “ordinary.”  In paragraph 1376, the Catechism says this: “Because Christ our Redeemer said that it was truly his body that he was offering under the species of bread, it has always been the conviction of the Church of God . . . that by the consecration of the bread and wine there takes place a change of the whole substance of the bread into the substance of the body of Christ our Lord and of the whole substance of the wine into the substance of his blood. This change the holy Catholic Church has fittingly and properly called transubstantiation.”  As St. Paul puts it in today’s second reading, “The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not a participation in the blood of Christ?  The bread that we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ?”

And yet, as we all know, 99.99999% of the time the accidents (i.e., the physical properties) of the bread and wine don’t change along with the substance.  Even after the consecration, the host still looks like bread and feels like bread and tastes like bread; and the consecrated wine still has the physical properties it had before the Eucharistic prayer was said over it.

So Jesus has given us these miracles to help us to trust in his word and to look beyond what our human senses tell us.  Notice that in today’s gospel from John 6, when the people object after Jesus tells them he’s going to give them his flesh to eat and his blood to drink, our Lord doesn’t back off!  He doesn’t say, “Well, I didn’t mean it literally!  I meant it symbolically.”

No!  He gets even more emphatic about it!  He says, “Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you.”

Lord Jesus, today we thank you for loving us by giving your life for us on the cross—and by humbling yourself in this way and becoming our spiritual food.  Help us to be more aware of your presence in the Holy Eucharist in the future—so that we will always be concerned to be reverent and properly disposed when we receive, and so that we will be open to all the graces you want to give us in and through your holy Body and Blood.  Amen.